Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_12.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CAAG FASTA(n).Sequence=CAAG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:19
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.93, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUGA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.08, deficit -1.13, CutoffScore  48.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  89.83, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGGUA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.84, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.87, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.49, deficit  0.39, CutoffScore  64.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.99, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  80.07, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.45, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGUUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  64.66, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.76, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  87.17, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.30, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  46.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.33, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.13, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  83.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGUA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.84, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.87, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUGAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.74, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.68, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  63.39, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.14, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  51.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  90.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUAA 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGACA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.93, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGGAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.42, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.12, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.67, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUUGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.79, deficit -0.13, CutoffScore  69.78, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GAACAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  74.47, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCGGU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.04, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  35.51, ed  4, 2 cWW                                     
GGAGUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.67, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  84.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUCC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score     -10.31, deficit  7.11, CutoffScore  25.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUCCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.80, deficit -0.43, CutoffScore  72.95, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -5.93, deficit -0.17, CutoffScore  70.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  47.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCCUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.42, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.10, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
CGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.90, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  67.21, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.07, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  55.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.85, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  79.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
GAAAUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  49.18, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.94, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  66.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  78.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAUCA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.18, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  82.02, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.07, deficit  3.60, CutoffScore  30.55, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -4.32, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  63.94, ed  1, 1 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.43, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  82.57, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.52, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.22, CutoffScore  45.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.26, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  67.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.11, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.98, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  66.43, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.43, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  82.57, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGACCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.77, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -5.29, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  81.79, ed  1, 0 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
CAAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.36, deficit -0.24, CutoffScore  70.98, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAAAU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.27, deficit  1.51, CutoffScore  84.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  67.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCGG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -1.94, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_28791.1,  6 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -3.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.65, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GUCAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.84, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  36.66, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.33, deficit  6.57, CutoffScore  31.52, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.16, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  58.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.36, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.32, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCCCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -7.18, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  39.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUUAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.54, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  95.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUGAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.76, deficit -0.64, CutoffScore  43.54, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  56.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CCACCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.16, deficit  0.44, CutoffScore  63.83, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGUUGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.65, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  58.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CAGAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.56, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.38, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGUCUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -10.04, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.57, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUUUUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  63.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
AUUUAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.56, deficit  0.47, CutoffScore  65.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGUACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  19.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  99.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.55, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.24, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCACCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.60, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  69.72, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.65, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UGUCAAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  58.37, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.79, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  29.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAAGAUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.13, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  67.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCCAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.91, deficit  0.44, CutoffScore  32.16, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUUAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  56.73, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
UUGCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score     -10.30, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  11.31, ed  1, 1 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
CCGGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.42, deficit  0.32, CutoffScore  37.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUCUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.76, deficit  1.83, CutoffScore  49.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUCUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -10.04, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.57, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.49, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAACAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  79.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCUUAUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.87, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  47.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGUUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  57.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GCGCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.35, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  54.65, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
UGGUCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.99, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  54.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGCGAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.76, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.98, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  32.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGUUGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.61, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  67.23, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUACGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.76, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  45.72, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAAACGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -5.84, deficit -0.61, CutoffScore  52.98, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAACAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.49, deficit  7.73, CutoffScore  19.44, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAUAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.06, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  61.49, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.02, deficit -0.21, CutoffScore  39.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.48, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  49.41, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
UUGUCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -11.87, deficit  3.64, CutoffScore  30.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore  39.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.95, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  84.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUGUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.19, CutoffScore  77.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCGGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.28, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGCCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.32, deficit -0.41, CutoffScore  41.15, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUAGCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.22, deficit  3.58, CutoffScore  22.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUCAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.23, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  48.03, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUGCUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.07, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  26.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CGGAGCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.80, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  12.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.71, deficit  0.27, CutoffScore  65.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAAACCAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.24, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  46.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
UUUAGAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -7.93, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  52.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGUGAAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.05, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  51.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAAUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.29, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore   8.34, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CAAGUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.76, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  10.61, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
AAAGAAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.87, deficit  1.82, CutoffScore  49.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUAGAAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  29.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGUCGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.40, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  33.09, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.84, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  21.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAUCUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.94, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  49.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -8.83, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  37.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  41.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CGUGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.24, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  67.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGUGGAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.91, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  29.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUUGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  53.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCCAUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -12.40, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  29.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAACACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  50.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGGUCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.31, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  23.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CUCGUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.68, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  22.25, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGCUUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.21, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore   7.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.08, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  29.24, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -11.02, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  20.74, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAGAUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -8.10, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  15.28, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.33, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  27.56, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACCGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore   7.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.65, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  13.89, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.07, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  40.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCCGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.71, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  21.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGAUAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.98, deficit  5.61, CutoffScore  22.55, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCCAAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAAAGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.81, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  84.99, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCUACAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.30, deficit  4.87, CutoffScore  31.23, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAACAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -8.13, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  21.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAAAGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.23, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAAAAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -7.48, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  52.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAAGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.13, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  92.24, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGACGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.90, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  42.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAUAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -11.74, deficit  5.72, CutoffScore   5.83, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CAAUUAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -8.93, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  40.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.12, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  19.44, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -12.18, deficit  4.36, CutoffScore  25.56, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUUAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.21, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  34.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GUCUAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.36, deficit  6.26, CutoffScore  35.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.83, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  71.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.12, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.83, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  71.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  67.07, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GAUCUCCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.43, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  53.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGCAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -6.46, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  47.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GGAUGCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.08, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  25.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
CAAUGGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -8.52, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  72.00, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUGAUGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.48, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  14.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAACAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.68, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  20.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUAUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -6.97, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  75.81, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -14.15, deficit  4.81, CutoffScore  19.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAUAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.91, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUGCCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.10, deficit  3.76, CutoffScore  25.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
UGUGCAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.29, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore   3.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -10.01, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  23.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GUCCUAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score      -5.09, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  74.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGUCGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.32, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore  26.98, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGGCACAGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.96, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore   8.63, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCCUUUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -11.26, deficit  4.84, CutoffScore  22.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
GCGUUACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score     -10.21, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  27.64, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAUCUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.02, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  56.90, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -15.35, deficit  9.53, CutoffScore  20.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUCGAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.69, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GACUCGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -10.78, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  33.57, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAAAGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.24, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  38.43, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUUAAGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -7.15, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  33.56, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UAAGAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score     -10.91, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   8.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUGCGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.37, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore  37.80, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUAUUUUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -11.98, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  32.83, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCUCGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.24, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore   7.61, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCUAACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.06, deficit  5.77, CutoffScore  29.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.61, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  32.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CGGUGUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.07, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  44.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAACUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.04, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore  43.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
CUCGGCACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.78, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  25.95, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CAUCUCUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.68, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  21.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCACAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.68, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  46.06, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGUUUAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore  53.83, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GCACGAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.05, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  47.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAAGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.41, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  47.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGGUGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  11.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCCGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -5.74, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  62.64, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GGAGUUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.12, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  39.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAAACUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -12.72, deficit  7.71, CutoffScore   4.76, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GGGUGGGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.15, deficit  2.02, CutoffScore  29.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GACCGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.15, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  55.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUAUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -6.97, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  52.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUUGCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.30, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  53.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GGUAGAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.14, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  34.57, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
UUUGCUUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.32, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  19.41, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
GAAAGAGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.82, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  41.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGUUGACAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.26, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  40.20, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAACUAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -14.88, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore   7.32, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
UUACAAAUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.17, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  34.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGGGACUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -17.24, deficit  7.69, CutoffScore  14.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGAUCGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.42, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  26.65, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CAUGAUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.68, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore   7.74, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAGAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -10.92, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  25.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
AGGUUUGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -10.23, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  30.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CUCAAAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -15.57, deficit  9.76, CutoffScore   0.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAAUAUGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.22, deficit  7.85, CutoffScore  27.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAAGCAAUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -9.61, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAGAGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.89, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  11.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUACGGUGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.89, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  27.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUCAAUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -13.10, deficit  8.03, CutoffScore  20.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGUCAUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -12.09, deficit  4.06, CutoffScore   7.57, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.22, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  55.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUUUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  46.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUGGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.28, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  52.57, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGGCAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -12.70, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore   3.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CAUUUUAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.84, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  53.21, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAUAGCUUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.53, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  15.84, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUGAAUAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.98, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  22.04, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUGCCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  27.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAGGUCAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.47, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  24.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GAGAAAGUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.82, deficit  6.48, CutoffScore  21.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAGGCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCGUUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  27.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUGGAACGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -13.23, deficit  8.16, CutoffScore  19.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGAUUAAAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.28, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  21.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAACCAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  14.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAGAAAAGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.58, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore   3.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GAACCGAGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -8.61, deficit  0.54, CutoffScore  42.12, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -8.61, deficit -0.74, CutoffScore  60.59, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUUAUAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -9.85, deficit  4.13, CutoffScore  32.49, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
UGAAGCAGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.37, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  49.42, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUAACUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.48, deficit  4.19, CutoffScore  38.66, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGAUCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.57, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  20.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CCAUGUGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UGGUGCGGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score      -8.72, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  22.56, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GAAAAGCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.48, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore   9.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUCGGAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.20, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  67.52, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAGUCGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGGGACUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -15.33, deficit  5.77, CutoffScore  26.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -9.97, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  31.70, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CUCAAUAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.71, deficit  5.43, CutoffScore  36.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUGACAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -9.55, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  34.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GAAGUAAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  31.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
UUGAACGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.13, deficit  5.09, CutoffScore  18.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAGAGAUAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.37, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  18.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CAGAGAUGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   9.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUCCAUCAGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.84, deficit  8.02, CutoffScore  14.90, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUGGAAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.17, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore  27.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGUCGUGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -14.92, deficit  7.05, CutoffScore  10.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUCCUGAUAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.40, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore   3.28, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCUUAGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  18.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCGACAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.53, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  10.52, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
GGGAUAUCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.56, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  16.42, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAUAGCUCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -15.46, deficit  9.87, CutoffScore   0.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUAAAUCAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.36, deficit  7.71, CutoffScore  18.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUUUAGUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -11.74, deficit  2.19, CutoffScore  29.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCGAAAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.05, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  59.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAGCUCUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -12.51, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  14.37, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAUAAUCGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.68, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  31.12, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGAAUGAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.04, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore  21.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAACUGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -13.38, deficit  9.04, CutoffScore   9.82, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
UUCAAAGAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.83, deficit  6.09, CutoffScore  15.38, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GCAAUUUGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -13.72, deficit  6.34, CutoffScore  19.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUAUGUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.67, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  24.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
UGACUCGAAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.82, deficit  7.04, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUUAAAAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.73, deficit  6.45, CutoffScore  47.29, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGGAAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -12.72, deficit  3.78, CutoffScore  20.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCUGAACGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -13.99, deficit  9.36, CutoffScore   7.91, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGAAGGUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.16, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   3.09, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGAAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.12, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  31.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAAUCAACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.73, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  22.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCGAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.63, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  37.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUACUUUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.96, deficit  2.35, CutoffScore  28.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAUGUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.66, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  12.65, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CAAUCGAUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -10.52, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  48.66, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUUCCUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -10.84, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  16.51, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAGUCAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -16.16, deficit  6.82, CutoffScore   4.03, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAGAAGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.04, deficit  8.23, CutoffScore  21.32, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGACUAACCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -13.75, deficit  6.38, CutoffScore   0.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGGAUACCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score      -9.93, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  14.47, ed  5, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUCUCUGUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.67, deficit  5.79, CutoffScore   1.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGUCGGAUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -16.83, deficit  6.72, CutoffScore   5.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUAUUAGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -16.48, deficit 11.45, CutoffScore  13.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
UGACAUGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.94, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  18.14, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAAGUGUGGCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.74, deficit  2.97, CutoffScore   1.41, ed  5, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAUGAUUUCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.41, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore   0.95, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAAAUUCUGAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.29, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  11.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAGUGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -15.72, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore   2.98, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGUCUGUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.24, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore   5.14, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUCAAUUGUCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -11.19, deficit  6.17, CutoffScore  10.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
CUACGGUGCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.64, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  12.41, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
ACAUUAUCCAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -15.02, deficit  8.27, CutoffScore   4.45, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUUAAAGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -13.53, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAACCGAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  23.16, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAUCCUGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.30, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore  12.37, ed  5, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GAUGCAAAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.40, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore  12.41, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAGCCGGAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.36, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore   8.75, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAACGCCAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.21, deficit  3.55, CutoffScore  12.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUCUCGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.88, deficit  4.10, CutoffScore   0.10, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGGAGAAUGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.33, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  44.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUAAUUUUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -15.22, deficit 10.88, CutoffScore   0.61, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CGUUAAAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.46, deficit  6.20, CutoffScore  23.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAUGUGCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.55, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   6.52, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GGUCUGAAAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.35, deficit  6.27, CutoffScore   7.60, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGGGAAGAGCUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.96, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore   7.72, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGACAAAACCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.54, deficit  6.28, CutoffScore   4.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAUUCAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.86, deficit  8.46, CutoffScore   9.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUAGUGGCGGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.17, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  33.31, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GAAGAACGUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -15.93, deficit  3.78, CutoffScore   7.53, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUGUAAACAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.91, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  14.54, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
UGAAGUUCAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -15.53, deficit  6.18, CutoffScore   8.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGACUACGUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -13.14, deficit  8.11, CutoffScore   0.58, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
UAAAAAAAAGAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.17, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore  12.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGAAAUGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.86, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore   2.32, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUCGAAUACAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.70, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  26.45, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUACGAAACCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84847.1, 14 NTs,        GUUCGCAACCAUCC,score     -16.11, deficit  7.97, CutoffScore   0.29, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F             
UGAGUGUCACAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -16.49, deficit  6.23, CutoffScore   6.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
UACGAACUCGGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -15.07, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  12.58, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAAAUUCAAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.26, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore   5.60, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAACUCGAGCACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.48, deficit  4.33, CutoffScore  21.90, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGGCUAAAAACCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.41, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore   1.62, ed  5, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GUGAUCUGACGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.75, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore   0.37, ed  6, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAUUGUUGUUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88364.2, 15 NTs,      UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA,score     -17.69, deficit  7.43, CutoffScore   1.98, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	100.0000	 10.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 72.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 46.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 30.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 80.0000	 68.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 92.0000	 52.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 92.0000	 56.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 52.0000	 18.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 30.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	 96.0000	 20.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  39 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  76 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 102 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 106 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 296 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 362 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 410 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 417 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 435 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 452 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 485 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 491 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 531 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 563 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 583 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 603 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 616 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 640 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 682 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 702 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 729 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 755 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 762 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 821 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 882 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 883 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 912 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1046 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1058 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 2.7308%
Number of models giving false positives is 234 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.65
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.21
